Australian National


(anotd)
Sunday 27th September 1998

This on-line paper is now archived for perpetuity in the National Library of Australia

Subscriber's password check (have your subscription number handy)
Subscribers get free access to the monthly "The Strategy" on-line from April 1998.

Recent stories exclusive to  (how to) subscribe/rs of the Australian National News of the Day now at the bottom of this page.


"ON NOW" weekly abbreviated anotd fax-back - Updated every Monday afternoon.
Dial: 1902 211037 and follow the instructions.

(Note: costs 0.75 c per minute will be billed to your phone account under "ON NOW NEWS LETTER")


Current topical links (available to all readers):
[Links to the MAI]
[One Nation on-line DISCUSSION forum] [One Nation Federal Web Site]
Archive of weekly features (available to all readers):
[The Canberra Column] [Economic Rationalism]


Today's Headlines
an Aussie's viewpoint on Australia's first daily Internet newspaper.
Since October 1995

Between the One Nation lines

In the last few days before the federal election I thought that the extract below from the article by Peter Cox in the Sun-Herald today was particularly relevant:

(The article is recorded in full in the USA at this link):

Of course media moguls and politics in Australia are inseparable. The moguls are looking to win political favour to change the rules so they can expand their empires in a mature media market. Kerry Packer needs to change the cross-media rules so he can gain equity control of the Fairfax group and be allowed to keep his Channel 9 television network.

So it was no surprise to see him endorsing Howard this week as he did in the last election with great success. Though he did not get the cross-media rules changed in the last term of government as he wished, he did get a tremendous gift from the government on the terms for digital TV in the future.

Now if they can affect support for Labor - imagine the damage they can do and have done to the credibility of Pauline Hanson's One Nation in the lead up to the Federal election. Further proof that we live in a society which symbolises democracy but nothing could be further from the truth.

Pauline Hanson attends Adelaide function:

Adelaide 26th Sept 1998
One Nation Campaign Dinner at the Stonyfell Winery.
Attendance : approx. 300

Pauline Hanson, David Oldfield, Len Spencer and All of the South Australian One Nation candidates were in attendance. It was a private function - no media allowed or wanted. Three hundred people had a three course dinner and most made some new friends.

Pauline made no long winded political speeches nor pleas for our votes nor shallow promises nor did she tell us lies.

She told a few amusing stories and asked that we not believe everything that the media choose to publish concerning Pauline Hanson. She gave credit to the many candidates and their teams and only wanted us to help them if we could during the rest of the campaign.

Pauline did not leave until she had visited EVERY table. She shook hands, signed autographs, had photos taken, was warm, friendly, and so naturally pleasant ! Adelaide had very successful day.

The Crows won the footy. Pauline won us !.

Three hundred people were extremely impressed by Ms Hanson.

Rose Thomson

David Cairns and Co Media management update

Despite writing to the company about their alleged illegal access to the anotd archives I have yet to hear a whimper out of this "credible" media group.

FINANCIAL WARFARE TO LEAD TO DEMISE OF CENTRAL BANKING?

By Michel Chossudovsky (professor of economics at the University of Ottawa, and author of "The Globalisation of Poverty, Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms", Third World Network, Penang and Zed Books, London, 1997.)

"Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men". (Franklin D. Roosevelt's First Inaugural Address, 1933)

(TiM Ed. The preceding FDR statement would probably be considered as sexist by today's PC standards.)

OTTAWA, Canada - Humanity is undergoing in the post-Cold War era an economic crisis of unprecedented scale leading to the rapid impoverishment of large sectors of the World population. The plunge of national currencies in virtually all major regions of the World has contributed to destabilizing of national economies while precipitating entire countries into abysmal poverty.

The crisis is not limited to Southeast Asia or the former Soviet Union. The collapse in the standard of living is taking place abruptly and simultaneously in a large number of countries. This Worldwide crisis of the late twentieth century is more devastating than the Great Depression of the 1930s. It has far-reaching geopolitical implications. Economic dislocations has also been accompanied by the outbreak of regional conflicts, the fracturing of national societies and in some cases a destruction of entire countries. This is by far the most serious economic crisis in modern history.

The existence of a "global financial crisis" is casually denied by the Western media, its social impacts are downplayed or distorted; international institutions including the United Nations deny the mounting tide of World poverty: "the progress in reducing poverty over the [late] 20th century is remarkable and unprecedented..." The "consensus" is that the Western economy is "healthy," and that "market corrections" on Wall Street are largely attributable to the "Asian flu" and to Russia's troubled "transition to a free market economy".

Evolution of the Global Financial Crisis

The plunge of Asia's currency markets (initiated in mid-1997) was followed in October 1997 by the dramatic meltdown of major stockexchanges around the world. In the uncertain wake of Wall Street's temporary recovery in early 1998, largely spurred by panic flight out of Japanese stocks, financial markets slid back a few months later, reaching a new dramatic turning-point n August with the spectacular nose-dive of the Russian ruble. The Dow Jones plunged by 554 points on August 31st (its second largest decline in he history of the New York stock exchange), followed in September by a dramatic meltdown of stock markets around the world. In a matter of a few weeks (from the Dow's 9,337 peak in mid-July), $2,300 billion of "paper profits" had evaporated from the U.S. stock market.

The ruble's free-fall had spurred Moscow's largest commercial banks into bankruptcy, leading to the potential take-over of Russia's financial system by a handful of Western banks and brokerage houses. In turn, the crisis has created the danger of massive debt default for Moscow's western creditors, including the Deutsche and Dresdner banks. Since the outset of Russia's macro-economic reforms, following the first injection of IMF "shock therapy" in 1992, some $500 billion-worth of Russian assets --including plants of the military industrial complex, infrastructure and natural resources-- have been confiscated (through the privatization programs and forced bankruptcies), and transferred into the hands of Western capitalists. In the brutal aftermath of the Cold War, an entire economic and social system is being dismantled.

"Financial Warfare"

The Worldwide scramble to appropriate wealth through "financial manipulation" is the driving force behind this crisis. It is also the source of economic turmoil and social devastation. In the words of renowned currency speculator and billionaire George Soros (who made $1.6 billion of speculative gains in the dramatic crash of the British pound in 1992) "extending the market mechanism to all domains has the potential of destroying society". This manipulation of market forces by powerful actors constitutes a form of financial and economic warfare. No need to re-colonize lost territory or send in invading armies.

In the late twentieth century, the outright "conquest of nations" meaning the control over productive assets, labor, natural resources and institutions can be carried out in an impersonal fashion from the corporate boardroom: commands are dispatched from a computer terminal, or a cell phone. Relevant data are instantly relayed to major financial markets - often resulting in immediate disruptions in the functioning of national economies. "Financial warfare" also applies complex speculative instruments including the gamut of derivative trade, forward foreign exchange transactions, currency options, hedge funds, index funds, etc. Speculative instruments have been used with the ultimate purpose of capturing financial wealth and acquiring control over productive assets. In the words of Malaysia's Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad: "This deliberate devaluation of the currency of a country by currency traders purely for profit is a serious denial of the rights of independent nations".

The appropriation of global wealth through this manipulation of market forces is routinely supported by the IMF's lethal macro-economic interventions which act almost concurrently in ruthlessly disrupting national economies all over the World. "Financial warfare" knows no territorial boundaries; it does not limit its actions to besieging former enemies of the Cold War era. In Korea, Indonesia and Thailand, the vaults of the central banks were pillaged by institutional speculators while the monetary authorities sought in vain to prop up their ailing currencies. In 1997, more than 100 billion dollars of Asia's hard currency reserves had been confiscated and transferred (in a matter of months) into private financial hands. In the wake of the currency devaluations, real earnings and employment plummeted virtually overnight leading to mass poverty in countries which had in the post-War period registered significant economic and social progress.

The financial scam in the foreign exchange market had destabilised national economies, thereby creating the preconditions for the subsequent plunder of the Asian countries' productive assets by so-called "vulture foreign investors".6 In Thailand, 56 domestic banks and financial institutions were closed down on orders of the IMF, unemployment virtually doubled overnight.

Similarly in Korea, the IMF "rescue operation" has unleashed a lethal chain of bankruptcies, leading to an outright liquidation of so-called "troubled merchant banks". In the wake of the IMF's "mediation" (put in place in December 1997 after high-level consultations with the World's largest commercial and merchant banks), "an average of more than 200 companies [were] shut down per day (...) 4,000 workers every day were driven out onto streets as unemployed".

Resulting from the credit freeze and "the instantaneous bank shut-down", some 15,000 bankruptcies are expected in 1998, including 90 percent of Korea's construction companies (with combined debts of $20 billion dollars to domestic financial institutions). South Korea's Parliament has been transformed into a "rubber stamp". Enabling legislation is enforced through "financial blackmail": if the legislation is not speedily enacted according to IMF's deadlines, the disbursements under the bail-out will be suspended with the danger of renewed currency speculation.

In turn, the IMF sponsored "exit programme" (ie. forced bankruptcy) has deliberately contributed to fracturing the chaebols which are now invited to establish "strategic alliances with foreign firms" (meaning their eventual control by Western capital). With the devaluation, the cost of Korean labour had also tumbled: "It's now cheaper to buy one of these [high tech] companies than buy a factory -- and you get all the distribution, brand-name recognition and trained labour force free in the bargain"...

The Demise of Central Banking

In many regards, this worldwide crisis marks the demise of central banking meaning the derogation of national economic sovereignty and the inability of the national State to control money creation on behalf of society. In other words, privately held money reserves in the hands of "institutional speculators" far exceed the limited capabilities of the World's central banks. The latter acting individually or collectively are no longer able to fight the tide of speculative activity. Monetary policy is in the hands of private creditors who have the ability to freeze State budgets, paralyze the payments process, thwart the regular disbursement of wages to millions of workers (as in the former Soviet Union) and precipitate the collapse of production and social programs. As the crisis deepens, speculative raids on central banks are extending into China, Latin America and the Middle East with devastating economic and social consequences.

This ongoing pillage of central bank reserves, however, is by no means limited to developing countries. It has also hit several Western countries including Canada and Australia where the monetary authorities have been incapable of stemming the slide of their national currencies. In Canada, billions of dollars were borrowed from private financiers to prop up central bank reserves in the wake of speculative assaults. In Japan where the yen has tumbled to new lows-- "the Korean scenario" is viewed (according to economist Michael Hudson), as a "dress rehearsal" for the take over of Japan's financial sector by a handful of Western investment banks. The big players are Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Morgan Gruenfell among others who are buying up Japan's bad bank loans at less than ten percent of their face value.

In recent months both US Secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin and Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright have exerted political pressure on Tokyo insisting "on nothing less than an immediate disposal of Japan's bad bank loans--preferably to US and other foreign "vulture investors" at distress prices. To achieve their objectives they are even pressuring Japan to rewrite its constitution, restructure its political system and cabinet and redesign its financial system... Once foreign investors gain control of Japanese banks, these banks will move to take over Japanese industry..."

Creditors and Speculators

The World's largest banks and brokerage houses are both creditors and institutional speculators. In the present context, they contribute (through their speculative assaults) to destabilizing national currencies thereby boosting the volume of dollar denominated debts. They then reappear as creditors with a view to collecting these debts. Finally, they are called in as "policy advisors" or consultants in the IMF-World Bank sponsored "bankruptcy programs" of which they are the ultimate beneficiaries. In Indonesia, for instance, amidst street rioting and in the wake of Suharto's resignation, the privatization of key sectors of the Indonesian economy ordered by the IMF was entrusted to eight of the World's largest merchant banks including Lehman Brothers, Credit Suisse-First Boston, Goldman Sachs and UBS/SBC Warburg Dillon Read. The World's largest money managers set countries on fire and are then called in as firemen (under the IMF "rescue plan") to extinguish the blaze. They ultimately decide which enterprises are to be closed down and which are to be auctioned off to foreign investors at bargain prices.

Who Funds the IMF Bailouts?

Under repeated speculative assaults, Asian central banks had entered into multi-billion dollar contracts (in the forward foreign exchange market) in a vain attempt to protect their currency. With the total depletion of their hard currency reserves, the monetary authorities were forced to borrow large amounts of money under the IMF bailout agreement. Following a scheme devised during the Mexican crisis of 1994-95, the bailout money, however, is not intended "to rescue the country"; in fact the money never entered Korea, Thailand or Indonesia; it was earmarked to reimburse the "institutional speculators", to ensure that they would be able to collect their multi-billion dollar loot. In turn, the Asian tigers have been tamed by their financial masters . Transformed into lame ducks-- they have been "locked up" into servicing these massive dollar denominated debts well into the third millennium.

But "where did the money come from" to finance these multi-billion dollar operations? Only a small portion of the money comes from IMF resources: starting with the Mexican 1995 bail-out, G7 countries including the US Treasury were called upon to make large lump-sum contributions to these IMF sponsored rescue operations leading to significant hikes in the levels of public debt.13 Yet in an ironic twist, the issuing of US public debt to finance the bail-outs is underwritten and guaranteed by the same group of Wall Street merchant banks involved in the speculative assaults.

In other words, those who guarantee the issuing of public debt (to finance the bailout) are those who will ultimately appropriate the loot (e.g. As creditors of Korea or Thailand) i.e. they are the ultimate recipients of the bailout money (which essentially constitutes a "safety net" for the institutional speculator). The vast amounts of money granted under the rescue packages are intended to enable the Asian countries meet their debt obligations with those same financial institutions which contributed to precipitating the breakdown of their national currencies in the first place. As a result of this vicious circle, a handful of commercial banks and brokerage houses have enriched themselves beyond bounds; they have also increased their stranglehold over governments and politicians around the world.

Strong Economic Medicine

Since the 1994-95 Mexican crisis, the IMF has played a crucial role in shaping the "financial environment" in which the global banks and money managers wage their speculative raids. The global banks are craving for access to inside information. Successful speculative attacks require the concurrent implementation on their behalf of "strong economic medicine" under the IMF bail-out agreements. The "big six" Wall Street commercial banks (including Chase, Bank America, Citicorp and J. P. Morgan) and the "big five" merchant banks (Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley and Salomon Smith Barney) were consulted on the clauses to be included in the bail-out agreements. In the case of Korea's short-term debt, Wall Street's largest financial institutions were called in on Christmas Eve (24 December 1997), for high level talks at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The global banks have a direct stake in the decline of national currencies. In April 1997 barely two months before the onslaught of the Asian currency crisis, the Institute of International Finance (IIF), a Washington based think-tank representing the interests of some 290 global banks and brokerage houses had "urged authorities in emerging markets to counter upward exchange rate pressures where needed...".

This request (communicated in a formal Letter to the IMF) hints in no uncertain terms that the IMF should advocate an environment in which national currencies are allowed to slide. Indonesia was ordered by the IMF to unpeg its currency barely three months before the rupiahs dramatic plunge. In the words of American billionaire and presidential candidate Steve Forbes: "Did the IMF help precipitate the crisis? This agency advocates openness and transparency for national economies, yet it rivals the CIA in cloaking its own operations. Did it, for instance, have secret conversations with Thailand, advocating the devaluation that instantly set off the catastrophic chain of events?" (...) Did IMF prescriptions exacerbate the illness? These countries' moneys were knocked down to absurdly low levels".

Deregulating Capital Movements

The international rules regulating the movements of money and capital (across international borders) contribute to shaping the "financial battlefields" on which banks and speculators wage their deadly assaults. In their Worldwide quest to appropriate economic and financial wealth, global banks and multinational corporations have actively pressured for the outright deregulation of international capital flows including the movement of "hot" and "dirty" money.

Caving in to these demands (after hasty consultations with G7 finance ministers), a formal verdict to deregulate capital movements was taken by the IMF Interim Committee in Washington in April 1998. The official communique stated that the IMF will proceed with the Amendment of its Articles with a view to "making the liberalization of capital movements one of the purposes of the Fund and extending, as needed, the Fund's jurisdiction for this purpose".

The IMF managing director, Mr. Michel Camdessus nonetheless conceded in a dispassionate tone that "a number of developing countries may come under speculative attacks after opening their capital account" while reiterating (ad nauseam) that this can be avoided by the adoption of "sound macroeconomic policies and strong financial systems in member countries". (ie. the IMF's standard "economic cure for disaster").20

The IMF's resolve to deregulate capital movements was taken behind closed doors (conveniently removed from the public eye and with very little press coverage) barely two weeks before citizens' groups from around the World gathered in late April 1998 in mass demonstrations in Paris opposing the controversial Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) under OECD auspices. This agreement would have granted entrenched rights to banks and multinational corporations overriding national laws on foreign investment as well derogating the fundamental rights of citizens. The MAI constitutes an act of capitulation by democratic government to banks and multinational corporations.

The timing was right on course: while the approval of the MAI had been temporarily stalled, the proposed deregulation of foreign investment through a more expedient avenue had been officially launched: the Amendment of the Articles would for all practical purposes derogate the powers of national governments to regulate foreign investment. It would also nullify the efforts of the Worldwide citizens' campaign against the MAI: the deregulation of foreign investment would be achieved ("with a stroke of a pen") without the need for a cumbersome multilateral agreement under OECD or WTO auspices and without the legal hassle of a global investment treaty entrenched in international law.

Creating a Global Financial Watchdog

As the aggressive scramble for global wealth unfolds and the financial crisis reaches dangerous heights, international banks and speculators are anxious to play a more direct role in shaping financial structures to their advantage as well as "policing" country level economic reforms. Free market conservatives in the United States (associated with the Republican Party) have blamed the IMF for its reckless behavior. Disregarding the IMF's intergovernmental status, they are demanding greater US control over the IMF. They have also hinted that the IMF should henceforth perform a more placid role (similar to that of the bond rate agencies such as Moody's or Standard and Poor) while consigning the financing of the multi-billion dollar bail-outs to the private banking sector.

Discussed behind closed doors in April 1998, a more perceptive initiative (couched in softer language) was put forth by the World's largest banks and investment houses through their Washington mouthpiece (the Institute of International Finance). The banks proposal consists in the creation of a "Financial Watchdog --a so-called "Private Sector Advisory Council"-- with a view to routinely supervising the activities of the IMF. "The Institute [of International Finance], with its nearly universal membership of leading private financial firms, stands ready to work with the official community to advance this process."

Responding to the global banks initiative, the IMF has called for concrete "steps to strengthen private sector involvement" in crisis management --what might be interpreted as a "power sharing arrangement" between the IMF and the global banks.

The international banking community has also set up it own high level "Steering Committee on Emerging Markets Finance" integrated by some of the World's most powerful financiers including William Rhodes, Vice Chairman of Citibank and Sir David Walker, Chairman of Morgan Stanley. The hidden agenda behind these various initiatives is to gradually transform the IMF --from its present status as an inter-governmental body-- into a full fledged bureaucracy which more effectively serves the interests of the global banks. More importantly, the banks and speculators want access to the details of IMF negotiations with member governments which will enable them to carefully position their assaults in financial markets both prior and in the wake of an IMF bailout agreement. The global banks (pointing to the need for "transparency") have called upon "the IMF to provide valuable insights [on its dealings with national governments] without revealing confidential information...". But what they really want is privileged inside information.

The ongoing financial crisis is not only conducive to the demise of national State institutions all over the World, it also consists in the step by step dismantling (and possible privatisation) of the post War institutions established by the founding fathers at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944. In striking contrast with the IMF's present-day destructive role, these institutions were intended by their architects to safeguard the stability of national economies. In the words of Henry Morgenthau, US Secretary of the Treasury in his closing statement to the Conference (22 July 1944): "We came here to work out methods which would do away with economic evils --the competitive currency devaluation and destructive impediments to trade-- which preceded the present war. We have succeeded in this effort."

----------
Michel Chossudovsky
Department of Economics
University of Ottawa


Making the news" -
an indepth exposé of media and political collusion at the highest possible levels in Australia.


email the editor

You say:

Indigenous Apology?

Hi Scott,...."

.It is an unfailing rule in history,that, when a civilized nation subdues one less advanced, the ultimate benefit derived by the conquered people far outweighs any temporary loss at first suffered."

......William Francis Collier. L.L.D. 1895.

regards
WAYNE H.

FLAT TAX

THE CONCEPT OF A FLAT RATE OF TAX IS WONDERFUL SWITZERLAND HAS A TAX CALLED TURNOVER TAX, ITS AONCE ONLY TAX OF 5% AT WHOLESALE LEVEL. I UNDERSTAND THIS LOW TAX PRODUCES MORE THAN HALF THE TOTAL TAX TAKE OF THAT COUNTRY.

BEING A BELIVER IN A VERY BASIC PREMISE, THAT IS THAT THE MAIN PROBLEM WITH GOVERNMENT IS THAT IT TAXES TO THE POINT OF KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG IVE LOVED HEARING ABOUT THIS BREAKTHROUGH IN CLEAR RATIONAL THINKING.

REGARDS
IAN CARTER

Rural internat access more expensive!

http://www.saia.asn.au/Documents/medrel/98058.html

We are concerned that the actions of Telstra will make rural access even more expensive than it is now as most ISPs use PAPL as a part of their infrastructure and the increased cost to replace the PAPL service will need to be passed on into the rural area customers as well.

This will certainly dilute the impact of additional $11 million that a Liberal government would put into rural internet access announced today by Senator Alston at the National Press Club luncheon in Canberra.

(See http://www.liberal.org.au/election98/policy/internet/internet.html and
http://www.abc.net.au/election98/news/stories/fe98-21sep1998-28.htm)

Also.....
http://www.saia.asn.au/campaigns/papl/index.html
http://www.saia.asn.au/Documents/medrel/98058.html

TELSTRA IMPOSE THEIR OWN INTERNET GST - INTERNET ACCESS CHARGES TO RISE DUE TO TELSTRA'S SERVICE WITHDRAWAL

Capitalising on voter disenchantment

The Executive Producer,
Lateline,
Australian Broadcasting Corporation,

Dear EP,

One wonders whether the subject matter raised on a recent Lateline programme has further opened up the media-induced focus on One Nation and the appeal of that party to the rebelling natives.

The cynicism of politicians who carp at each other over so-called policy differences and who don't seem to be listening to those hurt by the 1980's& 1990's style of "social policy" has been building since the mid 1980s & the present climate for the anti-establishment protest vote was initiated by the arrogance of Messrs Keating & Costello and encouraged by the perception of unbending, stubborn & uninspiring leadership by John Howard and Tim Fischer.

The message that is about to be sent to the major parties' about their apparent lack of capacity to explain in down-to-earth speaking terms, the measures to be taken to avoid Australia being victims of the "market forces" formed from overseas trade policies, and the benefits that can be "gained" by the application of "economic rationalist policies" and "globalisation", will possibly be of greater magnitude than their party polling is probably indicating mid-campaign.

Given the mind-set of the modern-day political parties, their "toe-the-party-line" serfs,and the ivory-tower based mandarins the protest vote would need to be sufficient as to create a hung parliament for the lead players to "listen" to the people.

Those parties that are locked solid into these proposed policy packages and the economic theories designed to accomodate them, will always keep mouthing off over differences in policies in the media-covered political arena to the contrary but the people want action, not words, to solve Australia's debt and unemployment problems created by the deficits & social policies of the Whitlam-Fraser-Hawke-Keating-Howard governments.

The Treasury bureaucrats have so brainwashed the relevant economic spokespersons that a set path of policies should be implemented & damn the voters.

They don't count in the main scheme of things.The same seems to apply with the departmental heads in the other portfolio divisions.

A focus on job creation and health issues by the Kim Beazley-led Labor Party is a good sign in many ways for their supporters and some of those affected by 1980-90 economic theories that the pre-Keating caring touch in the party has probably returned. The job focus however does hide their lack of initiative in proposals for taxation reform.Industry policy is not the be all and end all for solving Australia's job problems.

The Howard-led Liberals are proposing a GST in its tax package and Labor is proposing all sorts of goodies but no significant change to the Wholesale Sales Tax system. The proposed return of the Capital Gains Tax by Labor will send retirees financially bankrupt,depending upon the sum value of their assets & the income earned by them. Not much choice for the electorate is there!

The business elite people of the ilk of Mr Brack see the GST package as a means to an end in building business confidence in employing people in order to assist in the reduction of the 8% plus national unemployment rate (and the 25+% youth unemployment rate?).

The advocacy of a new bid to amend the Workplace Relations Act and the unfair dismissal laws in an attempt to argue the case for small business with less than fifteen (15) employees being allowed to retrench all or any of them without fear of a court case for wrongful dismissal which they may well lose money on in the event of a court defeat.

The unionists would then be able to argue the case against the Industrial Relations reforms being considered by the government's spokesperson Peter Reith. However,the ACTU will focus on the Liberals and business councils' union- breaking plans as an incentive to distract the voters from corrupt union practices with a scare campaign on job security for people in the workplace. Job security is achievable without the need for scare tactics & antagonistic anti-jobs Industrial relations reforms.Scare tactics work well occasionally but they invariably tend to backfire on those who create them & those stupid enough to mount a counter- attack. Creating even further voter disenchantment.

The Senate will be the centrepoint on many of the above matters if Labor, the Coalition,or a major party dependent upon Independent support is formed in the House of Representatives.

If the newspolls were a clear indicator of voter sentiment then the Hanson phenomenon would be less noticed by the media and the concerned rural voters who are potential vote winners for One Nation.

But such is the unpredictable element of voter intentions the candidates standing as Independents or for One Nation are quite capable of taking votes normally destined for the major parties.

Polls that show low numbers for the "others" column do not take into account the mood of the voters within each specific electorate. Those on the fringe of metropolitan areas and in provincial/rural areas do vote according to their own conscience. This makes newspoll surveys in the electronic and print media a less than accurate tool for pre-election voting intentions.

The poll that counts is on election day. In this instance, October 3rd,1998.

Adrian S. Mackay
Student of politics

Personal trivia, from the global office:

Another perfect day in paradise.

Have a good one.


Search Engine Boosters! 
This Ring Name site is owned by One Nation.

Want to join the One Nation ring?

[Skip Prev] [Prev] [Next] [Skip Next] [Random] [Next 5] [List Sites]

Recent stories exclusive to  (how to) subscribe/rs of the Australian National News of the Day:

Fairfax on trial- 23rd September 1998
Where the politically correct hang out - 20th September 1998
A brief lunch time controntation with Jeff Kennett- 8th September 1998
One Nation's Primary Industry Policy- 7th September 1998
One Nation's Tax Policy- 4th September 1998
One Nation "Media Adviser" shows true colours- 1st September 1998
One Nation Federal Fund Raiser - 21st August 1998
B'nai B'rith's discriminatory and un-Australian "Racewatch" - 18th August 1998
Four Corners become "Flawed" Corners - 11th August 1998
The Nicholas Street Rally - 4th August 1998
Their first day in Parliament - 28th July 1998
The 60 Minutes debate/debacle - 26th July 1998


Return to Australian National News of the Day

#



Web development, design, and storage by Global Web Builders - Email: global@gwb.com.au

See GLOBE International for other world news.


anotd