The AIJAC, master of distortion, excel in the article copied from this link...

The list of "key people and branches" was carried at the request of One Nation members in 1999 and 2000 after the disgraced David Ettridge tried to have the list censored to stop communication between branches.

At no time was the list carried by Balson without the full support of those placed on the list.

Somewhat different to the publication in the Australia/Israel Review of 2000 of the names and suburbs of One Nation members and donors from a stolen database in their magazine in 1998.

Finally, I have never heard of the "Victoria's Secret" article before - perhaps someone can inform me as to what it was about.

Scott Balson

The AIJAC article claims:

Not so] Great Scott: Scott Balson is a guy who runs one of Australia’s leading far right website, with complaints about Jews (an "elite racist community"), attacks on the media, and a variety of conspiracy theories of his own, mixed with links and postings often exhibiting even cruder racist and right-wing rantings. (See The Review, February 1999, p. 28, "Always Conspiracy.")

In July 1998, when The Review published its famous list of One Nation members and donors, Balson, then a fervent One Nation supporter, described it as an act of "Nazism."

Having now fallen out with One Nation, Balson appears to have changed his mind to the extent of publishing his own list. Balson has just posted his own list of One Nation "key people and branches." Moreover, unlike The Review’s supposedly "Nazi" list, Balson’s list contains details like postal addresses, phone numbers and fax numbers, which The Review list was careful to leave out.

But maybe Balson has changed his mind about The Review, as well. In his book, Murder by Media, Balson has a long rant about The Review, with his overall assessment being that this publication is engaged in "bastardry."

But recently, he appears to have decided that he likes The Review well enough to lift our articles. The story "Victoria’s Secret", by Matthew Collins (Review October 1999) appeared on Balson’s website in mid-October. Of course, since Balson re-posted this story without either attribution or permission and in clear violation of copyright laws, it probably does not indicate a change of heart about The Review, after all.